Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1446 (18 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1446-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWith reference to the article by Esmail,1 the purpose of revalidation is to ensure that doctors provide safe, effective health care for patients. The quality of health care that the patient receives could therefore be the basis of revalidation, rather than a measure of the skills and knowledge of the doctor.
Clinical governance could be adapted for purposes of revalidation as the means by which a doctor is held responsible and assessed to ensure the provision of a high quality of health care and the maintenance of the means to achieve it. Revalidation could be granted for fulfilling the requirements of clinical governance.
The advisory committee on clinical excellence awards administers a tried and tested scheme for granting clinical excellence awards, and the trusts have committees responsible for the granting of discretionary points in an integrated scheme. Revalidation could be incorporated in this scheme avoiding a plethora of
Anton E A Joseph, consultant radiologist
Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust, Croydon, Surrey CR7 7YE aeajoseph@hotmail.com