BMJ  2005;330:1446 (18 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1446-a

Letter

The General Medical Council and the future of revalidation

Revalidation, discretionary points, clinical excellence awards—steps on the same ladder

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—With reference to the article by Esmail,1 the purpose of revalidation is to ensure that doctors provide safe, effective health care for patients. The quality of health care that the patient receives could therefore be the basis of revalidation, rather than a measure of the skills and knowledge of the doctor.

Clinical governance could be adapted for purposes of revalidation as the means by which a doctor is held responsible and assessed to ensure the provision of a high quality of health care and the maintenance of the means to achieve it. Revalidation could be granted for fulfilling the requirements of clinical governance.

The advisory committee on clinical excellence awards administers a tried and tested scheme for granting clinical excellence awards, and the trusts have committees responsible for the granting of discretionary points in an integrated scheme. Revalidation could be incorporated in this scheme avoiding a plethora of . . . [Full text of this article]

Anton E A Joseph, consultant radiologist

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust, Croydon, Surrey CR7 7YE aeajoseph@hotmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Failure to act on good intentions
Aneez Esmail
BMJ 2005 330: 1144-1147. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ