BMJ  2005;330:1401-1402 (18 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1401

Editorial

Reducing variation in surgical care

Requires innovative methods for getting evidence into surgical practice

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Variations in surgical care have been recognised since the early 1980s and are generally interpreted as evidence of uncertainty among practitioners regarding optimal care. The prescription for remedying variations in surgical practice has generally included development of better medical evidence to identify best practices, dissemination of medical evidence to surgeons, and use of practice guidelines and care pathways to streamline care. More than 20 years later, there is still abundant evidence that surgical care varies substantially. Why do variations in surgical care persist? And what can be done about them?

In this issue of BMJ, Lassen et al (p 1420) report the results of a survey of lead surgeons in five north European countries regarding processes of care for colorectal surgery.1 These processes included use of preoperative bowel preparation, routine postoperative nasogastric decompression, and use of epidural analgesia in the postoperative surgical ward. The survey identified . . . [Full text of this article]

David R Urbach, assistant professor of surgery and health policy, management and evaluation

University of Toronto and Cancer Care Ontario, 200 Elizabeth Street, 10 NU-214, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4

Nancy N Baxter, assistant professor of surgery

Division of Surgical Colon and Rectal Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
(baxte025@umn.edu)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries
Kristoffer Lassen, Pascal Hannemann, Olle Ljungqvist, Ken Fearon, Cornelis H C Dejong, Maarten F von Meyenfeldt, Jonatan Hausel, Jonas Nygren, Jens Andersen, Arthur Revhaug on behalf of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group
BMJ 2005 330: 1420-1421. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials
P J Devereaux, Mohit Bhandari, Mike Clarke, Victor M Montori, Deborah J Cook, Salim Yusuf, David L Sackett, Claudio S Cinà, S D Walter, Brian Haynes, Holger J Schünemann, Geoffrey R Norman, and Gordon H Guyatt
BMJ 2005 330: 88. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lassen, K., Soop, M., Nygren, J., Cox, P. B. W., Hendry, P. O., Spies, C., von Meyenfeldt, M. F., Fearon, K. C. H., Revhaug, A., Norderval, S., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D. N., Dejong, C. H. C., for the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Gro, (2009). Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group Recommendations. Arch Surg 144: 961-969 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-based surgery
Min-Huei Hsu, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jul 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ