Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1401-1402 (18 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1401
Requires innovative methods for getting evidence into surgical practice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Variations in surgical care have been recognised since the early 1980s and are generally interpreted as evidence of uncertainty among practitioners regarding optimal care. The prescription for remedying variations in surgical practice has generally included development of better medical evidence to identify best practices, dissemination of medical evidence to surgeons, and use of practice guidelines and care pathways to streamline care. More than 20 years later, there is still abundant evidence that surgical care varies substantially. Why do variations in surgical care persist? And what can be done about them?
In this issue of BMJ, Lassen et al (p 1420) report the results of a survey of lead surgeons in five north European countries regarding processes of care for colorectal surgery.1 These processes included use of preoperative bowel preparation, routine postoperative nasogastric decompression, and use of epidural analgesia in the postoperative surgical ward. The survey identified
David R Urbach, assistant professor of surgery and health policy, management and evaluation
University of Toronto and Cancer Care Ontario, 200 Elizabeth Street, 10 NU-214, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C4
Nancy N Baxter, assistant professor of surgery
Division of Surgical Colon and Rectal Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
(baxte025@umn.edu)
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.