Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1400-1401 (18 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1400
Is useful, but changes in bone mineral density need careful interpretation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The successful treatment of osteoporosis is a relatively recent phenomenon. Although bisphosphonates are now established as the treatment of choice,1 this only came about with the publication in 1996 of the FIT alendronate trial.2 Nowadays the main treatment options are anti-resorptive agents that prevent bone breakdown. Most studies of these agents show good protection against fractures of the spine, while the more potent nitrogen containing bisphosphonates also show a reduction in non-vertebral fractures.1-5 For patients with previous fractures, treatment with an anabolic agent that enhances bone formation is clearly preferable, and this is now possible since the introduction of 1-34 recombinant parathyroid hormone (PTH).6 However, the use of PTH is limited by its high cost and the need for subcutaneous self injection. Recently strontium ranelate has been licensed in the United Kingdom for the treatment of osteoporosis. Here we draw attention to the unusual effect of strontium treatment on
Ignac Fogelman, professor
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT
(ignac.fogelman@kcl.ac.uk)
Glen M Blake, senior lecturer
Guy's, King's, and St Thomas' School of Medicine, London SE1 9RT
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.