Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1397 (11 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1397
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Change may occur by diktat, evolution, or default. So how did we move from a "consultant led" to a "consultant provided" service? Has anybody thought through the consequences? When I first entered medicine hospital doctors often did not become consultants, particularly in surgical specialties, until they were well into their 40s. In true Lancelot Spratt style consultants then had an impressive retinue: senior and junior registrars, senior house officers, andin one instance I can remembera "first assistant."
Doctors often preferred treatment by senior registrars for themselves or their families because they were usually the most up to date and had the most immediate hands-on experience. They were certainly experienced practitioners with a great deal of independence. Unfortunately they were still called "junior" doctors.
The system ensured that the burden of on-call work finally passed, so that when a doctor finally became a consultant he (it usually was a he
Graham Read, consultant clinical oncologist
Royal Preston Hospital, Preston graham.read@lthtr.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses