Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1346 (11 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1346-b
Rory Watson
Brussels
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Moves by the European Union to establish a clear legal definition for active and inactive on-call time for medical staff and other essential services, and to abolish the opt-out from the 48 hour maximum working week, have become entangled in the wider political debate on the future of the 25 member bloc's economic policy.
Social affairs and health ministers were unable to reach agreement on the latest proposed changes to the EU's working time directive last week. Some argued that its flexibility was essential for strengthening the union's economy and competitiveness. Others maintained that its existence opened the door to exploitation of employees.
|
|
Votes against the European constitution in France and the Netherlands (above) are affecting other European
issues Credit: JOHN MCHUGH/AFP/GETTY
|
The contrasting positions pit the defenders of Europe's social model, such as France, on one side against the more liberal reforms being championed by the United Kingdom. The
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?