Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1330-1331 (4 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1330-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBefore decrying preventive medicine in her article "Who needs health carethe well or the sick?" Heath should have defined the term.1 The best of preventive medicine has saved more lives and reduced more suffering at far less cost than all medical interventions, whether in the shape of immunisation, improved sanitation, or better diet. Prevention is about population interventions that are usually low cost and lead to reduced disability and death.
I believe that Heath is really talking about expensive interventions for chronic disease, usually the result of excess use of unneeded drugs such as alcohol and tobacco, or lack of exercise, among others. When these behaviours catch up with people they consult a doctor, having read of medical miracles in the newspapers and believing that medical intervention will regain a state of health.
These activities on behalf of older people in developed countries (which I think is what
Christopher M Buttery, professor of public health
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA rokimbo@comcast.net