BMJ  2005;330:1330 (4 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1330

Letter

Licensing diagnostic tests may benefit everyone

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Gluud and Gluud compare the introduction of new diagnostic tests with that of a new drug.1 However, laboratory diagnostic tests need only to prove that they are able to measure a given analyte, not that the measurement is of any use in managing patients. An inappropriately used test may have "side effects" leading to a delay in diagnosis or further investigation for a condition that the test result has wrongly suggested. Conversely, the introduction of a valuable test in the United Kingdom can often be piecemeal, subject to the vagaries of particular clinicians' demand and the priorities of local funding.

Gluud and Gluud mention using the pharmaceutical model effectively to "license" a clinical test for use. In the UK this would require a joint approach from the diagnostics industry and a Department of Health agency to acquire sufficient information on the clinical utility of a new test before . . . [Full text of this article]

Eric S Kilpatrick, consultant in chemical pathology

Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull HU3 2JZ Eric.Kilpatrick@hey.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Evidence based diagnostics
Christian Gluud and Lise Lotte Gluud
BMJ 2005 330: 724-726. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Setting to work on a licensing program
Giuseppe Giocoli
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ