Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1166 (21 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1166-b
Bryan Christie
Edinburgh
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A much more sophisticated approach is needed on drug safety if the recent debacle concerning rofecoxib (Vioxx) is not to be repeated. This is the view of one of the doctors who first raised fears about the cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitor.
Dr Garret FitzGerald, director of the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the University of Pennsylvania, told a conference in Edinburgh that the problems surrounding rofecoxib could well happen again in a different guise. He blamed the problem on the "absence of science" and the failure to act on emerging evidence of risk.
Rofecoxib was withdrawn by Merck in September when the company acknowledged that the drug carried "serious cardiovascular risks" (
BMJ
2004;329: 816
Dr FitzGerald told the conference, organised by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, that his team was reporting plausible biological evidence of a cardiovascular risk as early as
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?