BMJ  2005;330:1165 (21 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1165

News

GMC challenges court ruling on end of life decisions

Clare Dyer, legal correspondent

BMJ

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The General Medical Council went to the Court of Appeal in London this week to try to overturn a landmark high court ruling. The ruling had declared that parts of the council's guidance to doctors on withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment were unlawful.

Leslie Burke fears that when he loses the power to communicate, doctors might decide not to provide artificial nutrition

Credit: ANDREW PARSONS/PA/EMPICS

Last July, Leslie Burke, who is 45 years old and has cerebral ataxia, won the ruling, which was hailed as a breakthrough for the rights of vulnerable patients ( BMJ 2004;329: 309[Free Full Text]). Mr Burke, who is in a wheelchair, went to court because he feared that when he loses the power to swallow and to communicate, doctors might decide not to provide artificial nutrition and hydration, leaving him to die of thirst and starvation.

Mr Justice Munby, who delivered the . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Man wins battle to keep receiving life support
Owen Dyer
BMJ 2004 329: 309. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Re: Leslie Burke Ruling
Michael E Marks
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ