BMJ 2005;330:1071-1072 (7 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1071
Clinical review
Lesson of the week
Underwater birth and neonatal respiratory distress
Zainab Kassim, clinical research fellow in neonatology1,
Maria Sellars, consultant in radiology2,
Anne Greenough, professor of neonatology and clinical respiratory physiology1
1 Department of Child Health, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS,
2 Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London
Correspondence to: A Greenough anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
In 1992 the House of Commons Select Health Committee's report
on maternity services recommended that all hospitals should
provide women with the "option of a birthing pool where this
is practicable."
1 A subsequent surveillance study of all NHS
maternity units between 1994 and 1996 found that 0.6% of all
deliveries in England and Wales occurred in water.
2 Rawal and
colleagues have suggested that water births have become popular
among mothers and midwives because the buoyancy and warmth of
the water promotes natural labour while providing a non-invasive
safe and effective form of pain management.
3 Practitioners and
parents should remember, however, that birthing pools pose potential
risks for the baby. We report on a newborn baby who developed
respiratory distress due to aspiration after an underwater birth.
Case report
A full term male infant weighing 3150 g was born in the birthing
pool of the labour ward of our hospital. His mother was
. . . [Full text of this article]
Discussion
Related Articles
-
Underwater birth and neonatal respiratory distress: Case report does not constitute reliable evidence
- Elizabeth Cluett, Rona McCandlish, Ethel Burns, and Cheryl Nikodem
BMJ 2005 330: 1447-1448.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Underwater birth poses risks for the baby
BMJ 2005 330: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey
- Ruth E Gilbert and Pat A Tookey
BMJ 1999 319: 483-487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Author's reply
- Philip Steer
BMJ 1995 310: 1602.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Water birth and infection in babies
- J Rawal, A Shah, F Stirk, and S Mehtar
BMJ 1994 309: 511.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Datta, A., Tipton, M.
(2006). Respiratory responses to cold water immersion: neural pathways, interactions, and clinical consequences awake and asleep. J. Appl. Physiol.
100: 2057-2064
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Cluett, E., McCandlish, R., Burns, E., Nikodem, C.
(2005). Underwater birth and neonatal respiratory distress: Case report does not constitute reliable evidence. BMJ
330: 1447-1448
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Water quality underwater birth
- Chris N Hudson
bmj.com, 9 May 2005
[Full text]
- Water Birth
- Andrya C Prescott
bmj.com, 11 May 2005
[Full text]
- Waterbirth case report does not constitute reliable evidence
- Elizabeth Cluett, et al.
bmj.com, 12 May 2005
[Full text]
- Underwater Birth.
- Stan Hammersley
bmj.com, 13 May 2005
[Full text]
- Is it water aspiration?
- Martin Lalinec-Michaud
bmj.com, 13 May 2005
[Full text]
- One 'lesson of the week' may be to be careful not to misquote!
- Sheila Kitzinger
bmj.com, 14 May 2005
[Full text]
- Water birth : absolute risks remain unclear
- Andrew C. Breeze, et al.
bmj.com, 17 May 2005
[Full text]
- neonatal respiratory distress and water aspiration
- Simone Rugolotto
bmj.com, 17 May 2005
[Full text]
- Water Birth-A Paediatrician's Perspective
- Monika Bajaj, et al.
bmj.com, 21 Jun 2005
[Full text]