Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:966 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.966-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORGodlee's comment about the fragmented care described by Gannon in his personal view prompts us to provide additional evidence from our study at a district general hospital.1 2 As part of a research project we persuaded clinical teams to examine the quality of care in their own units.
We found evidence of adverse events or critical incidents in 60/154 medical cases and 27/134 surgical cases. Most of the issues were comparatively minor, commonplace problems that might be found in any hospital wardfor example, venflon cellulitis, over-infusion of intravenous fluidsbut in at least 12 medical cases and 16 surgical cases we found evidence of a lack of integrated care, in some cases with serious consequences.
Gannon thinks that we need to revitalise the role of the lead clinician.2 Our findings support his contention. However, is that possible and would it be enough? Over the past 20 years, hospital doctors have
Graham Neale, visiting professor
g.neale@imperial.ac.uk, Clinical Safety Research Unit, Academic Department of Surgery, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY
Sisse Olsen, research fellow
Clinical Safety Research Unit, Academic Department of Surgery, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY