Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:963 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.963-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn advanced, non-malignant, chronic illness, the proximity of death and the inadequacy of treatment to prevent it change the patient's circumstances. Accurate prognosis may be impossible and that also influences the circumstances. Although doctor and patient may know death is approaching, planning is needed for a stage of life that could continue for a year or more. For example, two year survival in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is 50-64%.1 2 Murray et al warn against a paralysis of clinical decision making, but the inaccuracy of prognosis in these diseases presents complex challenges.3
Planning for death in advanced chronic disease may seem pessimistic when life still holds rich possibilities. Murray et al seem to use the term end of life as a euphemism for death.3 But the context of their editorial demands a broader understanding. Approaching the end of life has implications distinct from imminent death. These
Patrick White, senior lecturer
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London SE11 6SP patrick.white@kcl.ac.uk