BMJ  2005;330:925 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.925

News

2005 UK election special

Patients' passports pop up again

Financial Times

Similarities between the Tory and Labour plans for the NHS mask the Tories' big idea—a subsidy for patients who choose to go private. Nicholas Timmins reports

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The conventional wisdom in much of the media is that there is not much difference between Labour and the Conservatives when it comes to the NHS. Both are fighting over whether the extra NHS spending since 1997, a doubling in cash terms by this year and a near doubling in real terms by 2007-8, after discounting for inflation, has been wasted. They battle jointly over access, choice, waiting lists, and bureaucracy in remarkably similar language and, in some areas, remarkably similar policies.

But that is to miss two absolute firsts. For the first time since the foundation of the NHS in 1948, the Conservatives are going into a general election with spending promises that, at least at the time of writing, stretch further into the future than Labour's. The second, against this apparent total commitment to the NHS, is an opposite—a promise to break with more than 50 years of . . . [Full text of this article]

-->
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In praise of trade offs

Jane Smith
BMJ 2005 330: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more >>