BMJ  2005;330:915-916 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7497.915

Editorial

Making decisions about mammography

Estimates of risks and benefits, should be set out in a straightforward way for patients

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Proponents of breast cancer screening make powerful claims for its role in reducing mortality.¹ The evidence is, however, disputed.² Critics argue that the presentation of information about the benefits of screening in terms of the relative reduction in the risk of dying from breast cancer is misleading and that the absolute reduction in overall mortality should be used.³ Another criticism is that women are given insufficient information about possible harmful consequences.⁴ In this issue, Barratt et al present a balance sheet of risks and benefits to help patients make informed choices about screening (p 936).⁵

The figures on the balance sheet are generated by using a mathematical technique known as Markov modelling. A disease is represented as a process with several states (for example, healthy, diagnosed, treated) and the probabilities of possible transitions between them. The model employed by Barratt et al uses statistics from BreastScreen Australia . . . [Full text of this article]

Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London N19 5LW (p.taylor@chime.ucl.ac.uk)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study

Ros Bramwell, Helen West, and Peter Salmon
BMJ 2006 333: 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Preventive medicine makes us miserable

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2005 330: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices

Alexandra Barratt, Kirsten Howard, Les Irwig, Glenn Salkeld, and Nehmat Houssami
BMJ 2005 330: 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study

Anne Helene Olsen, Sisse H Njor, Ilse Vejborg, Walter Schwartz, Peter Dalgaard, Maj-Britt Jensen, Ulla Brix Tange, Mogens Blichert-Toft, Fritz Rank, Henning Mouridsen, and Elsebeth Lynge
BMJ 2005 330: 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study

Karsten Juhl Jørgensen and Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ 2004 328: 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight

Gerd Gigerenzer and Adrian Edwards
BMJ 2003 327: 741-744. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review

Annette M O'Connor, Alaa Rostom, Valerie Fiset, Jacqueline Tetroe, Vikki Entwistle, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Michael Barry, and Jean Jones
BMJ 1999 319: 731-734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bramwell, R., West, H., Salmon, P. (2006). Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study. BMJ 333: 284- [Abstract] [Full text]