Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:906 (16 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7496.906-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMansfield et al discussed direct to consumer advertising of drugs.1 Consumer advertising on television is different from drug advertisements in newspapers and magazines.
Television advertisements mention risks very quickly, whereas the required "brief summary" in print advertisements includes more detailed information. Unfortunately, such summaries are usually illegible (because of tiny type sizes), unreadable (because of long and complicated sentences), and incomprehensible (because they require consumers to understand specialised research and pharmacological and statistical concepts).2
My readability analysis of six brief summaries found them to be written at a graduate school reading level; four "patient summaries" were written at grade 11-12 (for students aged 17-18), which was better, but still too difficult for many consumers.3
Cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors were widely promoted through consumer advertisements. But how could patients understand their risks if they couldn't understand the brief summary that described those risks? At some point, do patients (and their
Mark Hochhauser, readability consultant
Golden Valley, MN 55422, USA MarkH38514@aol.com