Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:904-905 (16 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7496.904-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCohen et al say that switching drugs to over the counter increases costs for most insured patients in the United States because of resultant changes in drug benefits.1 Most health plans restrict drug coverage and increase copayments when one member of the class is made available over the counter. However, evidence from recent switches from prescription to over the counter shows that patients benefit financially despite such restrictions and increased copayments.
|
|
Credit: TIM BOYLE/GETTY IMAGES
|
The switch of loratadine has been shown to be cost effective for consumers, insurers, and society.2
3 An examination of the average out of pocket cost for second generation antihistamines shows that health plan members paid less for loratadine after it was made available over the counter. Previously at least one second generation antihistamine was available through most health plans as a preferred brand product, with a copayment of some $17 (£8.99;
13.11) per
Patrick W Sullivan, assistant professor, school of pharmacy
Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Box C238, Denver, CO 80262, USA Patrick.Sullivan@UCHSC.edu