Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:844 (9 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7495.844
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORI support Fine's plea that we review the optimal immunisation schedule in developing countries using evidence from controlled trials rather than observational data.1 There are almost no controlled trials of the effect on mortality from all causes for any of the vaccines in the World Health Organization's schedule.
Fine says, incorrectly, that literature does not support non-specific effects of vaccines.
Firstly, BCG protects against leprosy and is the treatment of choice for some types of bladder cancer.2
|
Secondly, an individual's history of previous infection or immunisation can clearly influence the response to subsequent infectionsimmunologists call this heterologous immunity, rather than non-specific immunity.3 4
Thirdly, evidence that vaccines have heterologous effects comes from controlled trials, and not just observational studies.5
It is important to be clear about what is meant by the hypothesis that vaccines have heterologous (non-specific) effects. The hypothesis says that in high mortality areas, vaccines may affect
Frank Shann, director of intensive care
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia frank.shann@rch.org.au