BMJ  2005;330:844 (9 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7495.844

Letter

Non-specific effects of vaccination

Vaccines have non-specific (heterologous) effects

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—I support Fine's plea that we review the optimal immunisation schedule in developing countries using evidence from controlled trials rather than observational data.1 There are almost no controlled trials of the effect on mortality from all causes for any of the vaccines in the World Health Organization's schedule.

Fine says, incorrectly, that literature does not support non-specific effects of vaccines.

Firstly, BCG protects against leprosy and is the treatment of choice for some types of bladder cancer.2

Secondly, an individual's history of previous infection or immunisation can clearly influence the response to subsequent infections—immunologists call this heterologous immunity, rather than non-specific immunity.3 4

Thirdly, evidence that vaccines have heterologous effects comes from controlled trials, and not just observational studies.5

It is important to be clear about what is meant by the hypothesis that vaccines have heterologous (non-specific) effects. The hypothesis says that in high mortality areas, vaccines may affect . . . [Full text of this article]

Frank Shann, director of intensive care

Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia frank.shann@rch.org.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Non-specific "non-effects" of vaccination
Paul E M Fine
BMJ 2004 329: 1297-1298. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ