BMJ  2005;330:732 (26 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7493.732-a

Letter

Four pillars of academic medicine need to be restored

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Furness and Atkinson made several points that should be brought to the notice of the Department of Health, and the regional health departments of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, if clinical academic medicine of any quality is to be retained in the United Kingdom.^{1 2}

All the talk about improving recruitment to academic medicine (in the United Kingdom) is pointless unless Abbasi's pillars of academic medicine—research, implementation of evidence, teaching, and improved delivery of health care—are restored for clinical academics.³ Under the current regime, university management has to deliver the requirements of the research assessment exercise. The only hope therefore lies in the BMA and the departments of health influencing the process of the research assessment exercise to allow points to be awarded in a manner that pays roughly equal respect to all of Abbasi's pillars—rather than just one—in relation to the work of clinical academics.

The loss of . . . [Full text of this article]

University of Dundee Medical School, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY s.mukhopadhyay@dundee.ac.uk

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Academic medicine: who is it for?: Four old pillars seem to have been replaced by two new ones

Peter N Furness
BMJ 2005 330: 360. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Academic medicine: who is it for?: Wider discussions are needed

Jacqueline M Atkinson
BMJ 2005 330: 360. [Extract] [Full Text]

The four pillars of global academic medicine

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more >>