Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:730-731 (26 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7493.730-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWe thank Jureidini et al for their interest in the treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS) study1 but find their critique to lack accuracy, methodological sophistication, scientific rigour, and credibility.
TADS does not consist of "two separate randomised studies." Patients were consecutively randomised to one of the four TADS treatments using a computerised, stratified randomisation algorithm.2 3 Because comparative treatment trials that include both medication and psychotherapy conditions can double blind the conditions treated with medication only, but not those treated with psychotherapy, TADS employed an independent evaluator blind to treatment assignment, while placebo served as a credible, trial wide control.2 These are design choices, not design flaws.2 3
Jureidini et al confuse statistical significance with the magnitude of clinical effect. In TADS, combined treatment with fluoxetine and cognitive behaviour therapy proved superior to placebo and to cognitive behaviour therapy on five of five measures. Fluoxetine alone proved superior
John S March, chief, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Program for Child Affective and Anxiety Disorders
Duke University Child and Family Study Center, 718 Rutherford Street, Room 132, DUMC 3527, Durham, NC 27710, USA jsmarch@acpub.duke.edu
for the TADS Group
Read all Rapid Responses