BMJ  2005;330:730-731 (26 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7493.730-b

Letter

Authors of TADS study reply to letter raising concerns

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—We thank Jureidini et al for their interest in the treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS) study1 but find their critique to lack accuracy, methodological sophistication, scientific rigour, and credibility.

TADS does not consist of "two separate randomised studies." Patients were consecutively randomised to one of the four TADS treatments using a computerised, stratified randomisation algorithm.2 3 Because comparative treatment trials that include both medication and psychotherapy conditions can double blind the conditions treated with medication only, but not those treated with psychotherapy, TADS employed an independent evaluator blind to treatment assignment, while placebo served as a credible, trial wide control.2 These are design choices, not design flaws.2 3

Jureidini et al confuse statistical significance with the magnitude of clinical effect. In TADS, combined treatment with fluoxetine and cognitive behaviour therapy proved superior to placebo and to cognitive behaviour therapy on five of five measures. Fluoxetine alone proved superior . . . [Full text of this article]

John S March, chief, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Program for Child Affective and Anxiety Disorders

Duke University Child and Family Study Center, 718 Rutherford Street, Room 132, DUMC 3527, Durham, NC 27710, USA jsmarch@acpub.duke.edu

for the TADS Group


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

TADS study raises concerns
Jon Jureidini, Anne Tonkin, and Peter R Mansfield
BMJ 2004 329: 1343-1344. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Fluoxetine for depressed adolescents: harms likely to exceed benefits
Peter R Mansfield, et al.
bmj.com, 28 May 2005 [Full text]
Re: Fluoxetine for depressed adolescents: harms likely to exceed benefits
John S. March
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Re: Fluoxetine for depressed adolescents: harms likely to exceed benefits
Peter R Mansfield, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Fluoxetine for depressed adolescents: harms likely to exceed benefits
John S March
bmj.com, 16 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Public release of raw data from the TADS trial
Howard Mann
bmj.com, 16 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Fluoxetine for depressed adolescents: harms likely to exceed benefits
Michael Kozart
bmj.com, 25 May 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ