Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:600 (12 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.600
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOROn 10 December 2004 a banner headline on the front page of a popular tabloid newspaper read: "Cancer danger of folic acid" on the basis of a paper by Charles et al on taking folate in pregnancy and risk of maternal breast cancer.1 2 Although coverage in the broadsheets was more balanced, the overall message would inevitably cause concern to women taking folate to reduce the risk of fetal neural tube defect in a desired pregnancy.
|
|
Credit: CORDELIA MOLLOY/SPL
|
Despite the likelihood that the most likely explanation for the reported association is chance, as reported in the commentary to the paper,2 numerous susceptible women will probably not take folate, and some of these may conceive fetuses with neural tube defects. In addition, what company or government will take responsibility for fortification of wheat and corn flour with folate, now that this question has been raised?
The authors themselves point
Gordon Stirrat, senior research fellow in ethics in medicine
Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8BH g.m.stirrat@bristol.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses