BMJ 2005;330:574-575 (12 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.574
Paper
Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: population based study
Araceli Busby, lecturer in environmental epidemiology1,
Lenore Abramsky, registry leader2,
Helen Dolk, professor of epidemiology3,
Ben Armstrong, reader in statistics1, a Eurocat Folic Acid Working Group
1 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT,
2 North Thames (West) Congenital Malformations Register, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ,
3 EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, Northern Ireland BT37 OQB
Corresponding author: A Busby araceli.busby@lshtm.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
Each year, more than 4500 pregnancies in the European Union
are affected by neural tube defects. Unambiguous evidence of
the effectiveness of periconceptional folic acid in preventing
neural tube defects has been available since 1991,
1 and improving
folate status sufficiently could result in the prevention of
more than two thirds of all neural tube defects. We report on
trends in the prevalence of neural tube defects up to 2001,
in the context of a survey in 16 European countries of periconceptional
folic acid policies and their implementation.
2
3
Participants, methods, and results
Eurocat is a network of population based congenital anomaly
registries in Europe (www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk). A total of
9 273 212 births were surveyed by 31 registries in 16 countries
1980-2001,
3 including 8913 babies or fetuses with neural tube
defects (anencephaly, spina bifida, or encephalocele): 3298
live births, 844 stillbirths, and 4771 terminations of pregnancy
after prenatal diagnosis. In the United Kingdom and
. . . [Full text of this article]
Comment

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Incidence of neural tube defects is stable in Europe
BMJ 2005 330: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Taking folate in pregnancy and risk of maternal breast cancer: Authors and publishers must not disclaim ethical responsibility
- Gordon Stirrat
BMJ 2005 330: 600.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Taking folate in pregnancy and risk of maternal breast cancer: What's in a name?
- J Martin Bland
BMJ 2005 330: 600.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Taking folate in pregnancy and risk of maternal breast cancer: Authors' reply
- Deborah Charles, Doris Campbell, Marion H Hall, Andy R Ness, and George Davey Smith
BMJ 2005 330: 600-601.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pietrzik, K., Lamers, Y., Bramswig, S., Prinz-Langenohl, R.
(2007). Calculation of red blood cell folate steady state conditions and elimination kinetics after daily supplementation with various folate forms and doses in women of childbearing age. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
86: 1414-1419
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Tamura, T., Picciano, M. F.
(2006). Folate and human reproduction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
83: 993-1016
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Abramsky, L., Busby, A., Dolk, H.
(2005). Promotion of periconceptional folic acid has had limited success. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
125: 206-209
-
Dolk, H
(2005). EUROCAT: 25 years of European surveillance of congenital anomalies. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
90: F355-F358
[Abstract]
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Folic acid- The challenge of unplanned pregnancy and social deprivation
- Caroline L Relton, et al.
bmj.com, 12 Apr 2005
[Full text]