Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:489-490 (5 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7490.489
Named surgeons' outcomes have arrived
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Twenty years ago in the BMJ the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland published data from its cardiac surgical register.1 Figures for 1977-82 showed wide variation in provision of coronary operationsfrom 14 per million of the population in south west England to 200 per million in the London area. The north west and Mersey were well down at 50 per million (see figure on bmj.com). Reporting was by hospital and the identities were concealed before collation. In this issue the north west surgeons, in response to a clamour that has been around for some time, provide survival figures for 25 named surgeons.2 Others have posted surgeon specific mortality on the web.3 These data are believed to be "robust, rigorous, and risk adjusted," as required by Alan Milburn, former secretary of state for health, in parliament.4
Does disclosure of results serve patients' best interests? To put the
Tom Treasure, professor of cardiothoracic surgery
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RT (tom.treasure@ukgateway.net)
Read all Rapid Responses