Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:421 (19 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7488.421-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe BMJ's recent requirement that authors include a trial protocol when submitting research papers for publication seems reasonable to expose deviations from the original protocol.1 However, Abbasi and Jones's comment that "identifying deviation from the protocol is another important step in ensuring that the findings of a study are reported with honesty and transparency" rings hollow.
What are the other "important steps"? Is there, for instance, any evidence that such steps taken in the past have made a genuine difference to the reliability of data from clinical trials? Despite the many attempts to address the poor quality of reporting of trials, studies suggest that there has been little improvement in the standard.2 3
In any case, compelling researchers to include their protocols will have no effect on their honesty. If people are dishonest and intent on committing research misconduct, then they will do sopreventing them from deviating from
James Penston, consultant physician
Scunthorpe General Hospital, Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire DN15 7BH james.penston@nlg.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses