Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:362-363 (12 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7487.362-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMuch of the correspondence on the future of academic medicine has focused on the clinical specialties.1 2 Many of the problems are common to public health. The recent survey by the Council of Heads of Medical Schools makes it clear that public health medicine faces the most severe problems.3
The first is the overall changes in post since 2000: public health is the most negatively affected of all specialties with a loss of 32%. When this is put alongside the drop in pathology, a loss of 25%, this is particularly harmful for the future of academic health protection.
The second problem is changes by grade since 2000: a 20% loss of professors; a 22% loss of readers or senior lecturers; and a 59% loss of lecturers.
The third problem is that public health medicine has also lost most in funding from outside sources.
These figures speak for themselves in
Sian M Griffiths, senior clinical lecturer
Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF sian.griffiths@dphpc.ox.ac.uk