BMJ  2005;330:362-363 (12 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7487.362-a

Letter

Academic medicine: who is it for?

Public health faces similar difficulties to academic medicine

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Much of the correspondence on the future of academic medicine has focused on the clinical specialties.1 2 Many of the problems are common to public health. The recent survey by the Council of Heads of Medical Schools makes it clear that public health medicine faces the most severe problems.3

The first is the overall changes in post since 2000: public health is the most negatively affected of all specialties with a loss of 32%. When this is put alongside the drop in pathology, a loss of 25%, this is particularly harmful for the future of academic health protection.

The second problem is changes by grade since 2000: a 20% loss of professors; a 22% loss of readers or senior lecturers; and a 59% loss of lecturers.

The third problem is that public health medicine has also lost most in funding from outside sources.

These figures speak for themselves in . . . [Full text of this article]

Sian M Griffiths, senior clinical lecturer

Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF sian.griffiths@dphpc.ox.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Who cares about academic medicine?
Jocalyn Clark and Peter Tugwell
BMJ 2004 329: 751-752. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Academic medicine: time for reinvention: What really matters?
David G Connell
BMJ 2004 328: 47. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ