Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:308 (5 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7486.308
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAbbasi asks whether drug regulation is failing.1 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) performs a thankless task. Patients want new drugs available immediately and agitate to accomplish this. Patients also wish medicines to be guaranteed safe, and blame the FDA when toxicity leads to a drug's withdrawal. Clinical scientists complain that the FDA obstructs their investigations. Pharmaceutical companies see the FDA as an adversary, not a protector.
Practising in the USA for 20 years, I encountered many FDA agents. A few revered regulations for their own sake. Such people are irksome, but without strict oversight valueless and toxic agents would be marketed. A prime example is Laetrile (laevo-mandelonitrile-beta-glucuronoside), a useless and poisonous drug promoted for cancer treatment. The FDA, supported by the National Cancer Institute, successfully resisted extreme public pressure to allow its marketing, saving many lives and a multi-million dollar fraud.
The FDA faces serious accusations.
Alexander S D Spiers, retired professor of medicine
Cookham Dean, Berkshire spiersuk@btinternet.com