BMJ  2005;330:152 (15 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7483.152

reviews

Press

Keeping mum over child abuse

Is media coverage of Munchausen syndrome by proxy putting children at risk?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Just before Christmas the media moved rapidly to cover the sensational story of the "controversial diagnosis" of Munchausen syndrome by proxy, coverage in which the main villains of the piece seemed to be paediatricians hell bent on destroying families. This followed a statement by the attorney general that there was "cause for concern" and that appeals could be made in 28 out of 297 cases after a review of cases of children taken into care in the wake of the quashing of the Angela Cannings' conviction for murder ( BMJ 2004;329: 1256[Free Full Text]).

On 20 December the Daily Telegraph devoted a full page to a first person account by Angela Cannings, who was released from prison a year ago after the Court of Appeal overturned her convictions for murdering two baby sons. Yet what this article, and the subsequent raft of media coverage, failed to report . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

Raj Persaud, Gresham professor for public understanding of psychiatry

Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals, London


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Misconceptions
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Children forgotten? No. Traumatised and kidnapped? Yes.
C Johnson
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Why should people love or trust this system?
John Stone
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Misconceptions
Dr John Rumbold
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Keeping mum about flawed theories - helped by secret courts
Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2005 [Full text]
'Munchausen's by proxy' and allegations of infanticide
Ed Cooper
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Misconceptions
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
MSBP MYTH RESURRECTED
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Our Society cares greatly!.
Charles Pragnell
bmj.com, 17 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Oh dear, oh dear, Raj Persaud
Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 17 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Pity the children
Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Oh dear, oh dear, Raj Persaud
Rita Dr Pal
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Families denied Justice
Michael D Innis
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: 'Munchausen's by proxy' and allegations of infanticide
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Misconceptions
Dr John Rumbold
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Misconceptions
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Misconceptions
John Stone
bmj.com, 19 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Personal Experience
John Chapman
bmj.com, 19 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Personal Experience
John Stone
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Warning to anyone thinking of posting a response
Chapman John
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Personal Experience
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Infant deaths and the media
Robert Scott-Jupp
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Warning to anyone thinking of posting a response
Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Infant deaths and the media
Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Infant deaths and the media
John Stone
bmj.com, 22 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: Infant deaths and the media
David & Davina Hollisey-Mclean
bmj.com, 23 Jan 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ