BMJ  2005;330:103-104 (15 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7483.103

Editorial

Referring GMC decisions to the High Court

Acquittal by the GMC is not necessarily an end to a doctor's case

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The General Medical Council has recently come under serious scrutiny, especially after the publication of the report by Dame Janet Smith (see BMJ 1 Jan 2005, p 10). Among its many duties, the GMC also decides if a doctor is guilty of serious professional misconduct. However, acquittal by the GMC does not mean that the case cannot be referred to the High Court. In October 2004, the Court of Appeal ruled that a doctor who had been cleared of serious professional misconduct by the GMC could still be referred to the High Court by the regulatory watchdog, the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE). In one fell swoop, professional regulation has been radically and disturbingly transformed. Doctors now stand in double jeopardy.

Disciplinary tribunals against doctors (and other healthcare professionals) share commonalities with criminal law in terms of the required standard of proof (beyond reasonable doubt), and the . . . [Full text of this article]

Ash Samanta, consultant rheumatologist

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW (ash.samanta@uhl-tr.nhs.uk)

Jo Samanta, lecturer in law

De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Shipman inquiry finds GMC has "fundamental flaws"
Clare Dyer
BMJ 2005 330: 10. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

A Very Simple Proposal For Medical Regulation In The United Kingdom ::: 2005 Version
Joseph . C . Obi
bmj.com, 14 Jan 2005 [Full text]
The GMC- Unfit and Shameful
Jennie Colman
bmj.com, 17 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Human Rights Act 1998 - Article 6 Violation?
Rita Pal
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
GMC - time for an MOT test?
Oliver R Dearlove
bmj.com, 18 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Re: GMC - time for an MOT test?
Rita Pal
bmj.com, 19 Jan 2005 [Full text]
There is no need for double jeopardy.
R K Mohindra
bmj.com, 24 Jan 2005 [Full text]
'GMC-Induced' Multiple Jeopardy . . .
Joseph . C . Obi
bmj.com, 25 Jan 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ