Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:93 (8 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7482.93-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBoth the editorial by Del Mar et al and the paper by Straus et al raise important points that must be considered if both medical students and doctors are to be trained successfully in evidence based practice.1 2
Del Mar et al say that epidemiology and statistics are repellent to many doctors. In our experience, neither topic is repellent. However, feedback from medical students at the end of our clinical epidemiology course has consistently raised concerns about the ability of students without A level mathematics (a higher school qualification in the United Kingdom) to cope with the biostatistics component of the course, although no complex mathematical calculations are required. We therefore examined this empirically by comparing the exam performance of such students with that of their peers with A level mathematics and did not find any evidence that they were any less competent, at least as assessed by a
Yoav Ben-Shlomo, senior lecturer in clinical epidemiology
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR y-ben-shlomo@bristol.ac.uk