Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:93 (8 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7482.93
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORGabbay and le May put into focus the processes of "collective sense making" by which knowledge, both explicit and tacit and from whatever sources, is negotiated, constructed, and internalised in routine practice.1 They identified mindlines replacing guidelines in daily practice. If these processes of collective sense making are assumed to be shaped by, among other factors, culture and training, I wonder whether the social construct of mindlines is also a valid approximation for other countries.
For Germany I think that a similar study would reveal neither mindlines nor other linear structures. Instead of the linear, algorithm driven process commonly used in Anglo-Saxon practice, in Germany the process of diagnosis might better be described as adjusting memorised disease patterns to the clinical pictures of patients. The experience of a doctor is reflected by an increased number of actively retrievable disease patterns. The linguistic equivalent would be the term Krankheitsbild
Ansgar Gerhardus, research associate
Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine, and Health System Research, Hanover Medical School, D-30623 Hanover, Germany Gerhardus.ansgar@mh-hannover.de