Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:92 (8 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7482.92
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe term "evidence based medicine" entered the scientific lexicon only a little more than a decade ago.1 What caused its remarkable spread, and what are the implications of its broad and rapid diffusion?
|
The team that coined the term at first considered using the phrase "scientific medicine" but rejected it because it implied that other approaches were by definition unscientific.2 However, critics have argued that the term evidence based medicine carries a similar moral valence and linguistic slipperiness.3 Who could argue against the notion of providing care that integrates individual clinical skill and the best external evidence?4
Originally developed as a method for teaching medical residents, evidence based medicine is being applied ever more broadly to the organisation and delivery of medical services. Multiple stakeholders now seek to assume its mantle for purposes that often contradict its original intent.
Managers, equating lack of evidence with lack of effectiveness,
Benjamin Druss, Rosalynn Carter chair in mental health
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA bdruss@emory.edu
Read all Rapid Responses