Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:43 (1 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7481.43-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe paper by Aylin et al on paediatric cardiac mortality in England after Bristol provides some interesting and potentially perturbing results.1 The reduction in paediatric cardiac surgical mortality is encouraging, but the identification of hospitals with excess mortality is worrying.
Since 2003 all paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales have contributed data on all admissions to the paediatric intensive care audit network (PICANet), funded by the Department of Health.2 Families of patients treated in paediatric intensive care units in the United Kingdom may be reassured that in the data thus far reported no unit has an unexpectedly high mortality.
The method of analysis used by PICANet may be superficially similar to that used by Aylin et al, but on closer inspection it may not. PICANet produces mortality ratios that are carefully adjusted for the illness severity of children on admission to the unit using published risk
Gareth Parry, reader in health services research
Health Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA g.parry@sheffield.ac.uk
Elizabeth S Draper, senior research fellow
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP
Patricia McKinney, reader in paediatric epidemiology
Paediatric Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LN