Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:42 (1 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7481.42
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMurray et al propose that people with terminal conditions should be able to die at home with dignity.1 They fall short of initiating a practical, pragmatic, less idealistic, cost neutral solution.
Once a patient has been identified as requiring palliative care by their criterion "Would I be surprised if my patient were to die in the next 12 months?" a simple procedure should compulsorily take place. A form detailing palliative care management should be completed by the patient's general practitioner. This form should include details of the diagnosis, prognosis, and management plans and be emailed or faxed to the out of hours providerthe "unscheduled care services" to which the editorial refers. Additionally, any scheduled drugs that may be required to keep the patient at home should be prescribed and delivered to the patient's home. If these two simple procedures became part of a national plan, many (not all)
Julia Riley, consultant in palliative medicine
Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ Julia.Riley@rmh.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses