Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1405 (11 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1405-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOREarlier this year more than 28 000 people signed a petition calling for urgent government funded research into the physical causes of myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Such is the frustration of people who do not believe that their views are being listened to by the medical establishment.
So White's editorial reviewing the possible causes of myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome should be welcome news.1 But is it?
Many doctors support the idea of a disease model with predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors. However, White does not offer any innovative suggestions as to how this could be used to better understand an illness that now covers a wide variety of clinical presentations and an equally diverse range of patho-physiological findings. Having created this mess, the medical profession must now accept that this heterogeneous group of patients is unlikely to have the same pathoaetiology and respond to
Charles Shepherd, medical adviser
ME Association, Buckingham MK18 1TH charlesbshepherd@lineone.net
Read all Rapid Responses