Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1402 (11 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1402
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORFrost et al's conclusion that "routine physiotherapy" based on physical factors was no more effective than one session of assessment and advice from a physiotherapist in the management of low back pain is not surprising.1 But the defensive nature of the responses to this research is.2 3 This defensiveness arises partly from the perceived rivalry between health-care professions managing low back pain and the attention grabbing headlines used.
In recent years the evidence base has highlighted that low back pain is a multifaceted phenomenon incorporating physical impairment, psychological distress, and social interruption. Thus the effective biopsychosocial management of low back pain should reflect its multifaceted nature and not just focus on the "physical factors," as was done by Frost et al. Being an evidence based practitioner should entail identifying and managing patients' risk factors because risk factors are clinical predictors of outcome and efforts to manage them may reduce
-->
Maureen Simmonds, professor and head
m.simmonds@soton.ac.uk, School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ
Anne Daykin, scientific officer, Physiotherapy Pain Association
School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ