Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1307 (4 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1307-a
London Zosia Kmietowicz
Patient organisations need to be more tightly regulated to protect the public from bogus groups and undue influence from the pharmaceutical industry and other funding bodies, MPs heard last week.
Setting standards on transparency and accountability would help to distinguish legitimate patient groups from those set up by drug companies to promote awareness of a specific condition and drugs to treat it, said witnesses at the fourth public hearing of the health committee’s inquiry into the influence of the pharmaceutical industry.
There are more than 200 national patient groups in the United Kingdom and many rely on funding from the pharmaceutical industry, especially if they are concerned with less emotional and more mundane matters which do not attract the public gaze, said Melinda Letts, chair of the committee of medicines working group on patient information.
"The answer is not to ban funding from the pharmaceutical industry but
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?