Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1301-1302 (4 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1301
New code of conduct for editors is a first step in self regulation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"I am that wicked editor," announced the email from Richard Smith, then editor of the BMJ, to members of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) on their listserve two years ago. An aggrieved author had, at Smith's suggestion, complained to WAME's ethics committee after the BMJ went back on its promise to publish a paper. When the anonymised case was posted on the listserve, opinion from WAME's members was unanimousthe editor in question had behaved wrongly and the journal should honour its commitment to publish. The BMJ did.
This case is important. Although of a different order of magnitude than serious cases of editorial misconduct that have been uncovered over the past 10 years,1 it may be the first example of self regulation by journal editors. An author complained, a body of editors responded, and rightas perceived by those editorswas done.
Editors have traditionally enjoyed power without well
Fiona Godlee, head of BMJ Knowledge
BMJ Publishing Group, London WC1H 9JR (fgodlee@bmjgroup.com)
Read all Rapid Responses