Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1288-1289 (27 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1288-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe arguments put forward by Thomas and Clark against the use of sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma have not changed over the past four years.1 2 However, data are now available to test the hypothesis that completion lymphadenectomy might increase the rate of in-transit disease.
We identified 10 studies, including our own, which report patterns of relapse separately according to sentinel node status.3 Overall we found 701 relapses among 4713 subjects, of which 94 were nodal, 201 were either in-transit or local recurrence, and 406 were distant, giving an absolute rate of 2%, 4.3%, and 8.8%, respectively. In cohorts not subjected to selective lymphadenectomy the equivalent figures are 7.8% nodal, 3.4% in-transit, and 4.4% distant.4 In other words, selective lymphadenectomy reduces the absolute rate of nodal relapse mainly at the expense of an increased rate of distant metastases. It is difficult to attach too much importance to the
Robin Russell-Jones, director, skin tumour unit
russelljones@btinternet.com
Ciaran Healy, consultant plastic surgeon, department of plastic surgery, Ann-Marie Powell, specialist registrar, skin tumour unit, Katharine Acland, consultant dermatologist, skin tumour unit, Michael O'Doherty, consultant nuclear physician, department of nuclear medicine, Eduardo Calonje, director, diagnostic dermatopathology
St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas Hospital, London SE1 7EH