Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1287 (27 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1287-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn their quality improvement report on improving caecal intubation rates at colonoscopy Ball et al conclude that these improvements were due to three key measures: increasing appointment times, allocating the procedures to the most skilled operators, and improving bowel preparation in frail patients.1 We have several issues related to each of their interventions.
Firstly, colonoscopy appointment times were increased from 20 minutes to 30 minutes. The Royal College of Physicians recommends that consultant gastroenterologists perform a maximum of six colonoscopies per notional half day (3 1/2 hours)2; 30 minutes is therefore slightly less than the suggested minimum time per procedure. Perhaps increasing appointment times even further would have resulted in even better caecal intubation rates. Moreover, an appointment shorter than the recommended lower limit is unlikely to be adequate for training purposes.
Secondly, although it may seem sensible to allocate colonoscopies to the most proficient practitioners, this
Peter Irving, research fellow
p.m.irving@qmul.ac.uk
Joel Mawdsley, research fellow, Richard Makins, research fellow
Research Centre for Gastroenterology, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AD