BMJ  2004;329:1255 (27 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1255-a

News

Public interest group accuses FDA of trying to discredit whistleblower

Jeanne Lenzer

New York

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A public interest group that aims to protect whistleblowers claimed last week that an attempt had been made by a member of staff at the Food and Drug Administration to discredit Dr David Graham, the FDA executive who testified to the US Senate committee on 18 November.

Dr Graham, associate director in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, had carried out a study with Kaiser Permanente of northern California that looked at the cardiovascular risks in patients taking rofecoxib (Vioxx). He had submitted the results of the study to the Lancet. Dr Graham withdrew the study, however, after getting a warning from his supervisor.

The FDA issued a statement after the Senate hearing last week, claiming that Dr Graham had failed to adhere to agency protocol when he submitted his data to the Lancet.

When the BMJ inquired about the FDA's statement and the possible publication of the rofecoxib . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Is drug regulation failing?
Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • (2005). Hit parade. BMJ 330: 485-485 [Full text]  
  • Spiers, A. S D (2005). Save the FDA. BMJ 330: 308-308 [Full text]  
  • Lenzer, J. (2004). Crisis deepens at the US Food and Drug Administration. BMJ 329: 1308-1308 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ