Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1255 (27 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1255-a
Jeanne Lenzer
New York
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A public interest group that aims to protect whistleblowers claimed last week that an attempt had been made by a member of staff at the Food and Drug Administration to discredit Dr David Graham, the FDA executive who testified to the US Senate committee on 18 November.
Dr Graham, associate director in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, had carried out a study with Kaiser Permanente of northern California that looked at the cardiovascular risks in patients taking rofecoxib (Vioxx). He had submitted the results of the study to the Lancet. Dr Graham withdrew the study, however, after getting a warning from his supervisor.
The FDA issued a statement after the Senate hearing last week, claiming that Dr Graham had failed to adhere to agency protocol when he submitted his data to the Lancet.
When the BMJ inquired about the FDA's statement and the possible publication of the rofecoxib
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?