Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1239 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1239-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORLachman and Vickers grasp both the context and the opportunity of the national service framework for children.1 Before the framework, the Children's Tsar saw the fundamental constraint on change: "The English don't value childhood."2 But in terms of poor adult health, lifecourse research has consistently shown that the environment, experience, and capacity for learning in childhood set the scene for future illness.3
I was unexpectedly moved by the section dealing with the mental health of children and adolescents. Upfront, its focus was on the wellbeing and development of children and young people in England. It particularly challenged professionals in every area of practice to build genuine partnerships with children, young people, and families. In other words, if things are to improve for the whole population, children must cease to be invisiblethey must be seen, and heard, and listened to. Active participation, the sort of public involvement that makes
Woody Caan, professor of public health
APU, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1SQ a.w.caan@apu.ac.uk