BMJ  2004;329:1239 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1239-a

Letter

National service framework for children

Framework ignores children's growth

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The Child Growth Foundation finds it unbelievable that the national service framework for children, in the editorial by Lachman and Vickers,1 ignores the need to check a child's growth, either routinely or opportunistically, other than at school entry.

The assessment of growth should be a basic paediatric measure throughout a child's growing years, and Health for all Children, for all its woes, agrees that it should be considered at every health contact. When the framework fails to list any requirement to measure weight, length, or occipitofrontal circumference in the first four years of a child's life, one can be forgiven for thinking that no one in the Department of Health has any knowledge of endocrinology.

Recommending a single growth check at school entry is fairly useless, too, since it shows only how tall, short, thin, or fat the child is on the day. It will not show . . . [Full text of this article]

Tam Fry, honorary chairman

Child Growth Foundation, London W4 1PW cgflondon@aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The national service framework for children
Peter Lachman and David Vickers
BMJ 2004 329: 693-694. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

White Paper on public health ignores growth, too
Tam Fry
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ