Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1239 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1239-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe Child Growth Foundation finds it unbelievable that the national service framework for children, in the editorial by Lachman and Vickers,1 ignores the need to check a child's growth, either routinely or opportunistically, other than at school entry.
The assessment of growth should be a basic paediatric measure throughout a child's growing years, and Health for all Children, for all its woes, agrees that it should be considered at every health contact. When the framework fails to list any requirement to measure weight, length, or occipitofrontal circumference in the first four years of a child's life, one can be forgiven for thinking that no one in the Department of Health has any knowledge of endocrinology.
Recommending a single growth check at school entry is fairly useless, too, since it shows only how tall, short, thin, or fat the child is on the day. It will not show
Tam Fry, honorary chairman
Child Growth Foundation, London W4 1PW cgflondon@aol.com
Read all Rapid Responses