BMJ  2004;329:1233-1236 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1233

Education and debate

Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values?

Joanna Coast, senior lecturer in health economics1

1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR jo.coast@bristol.ac.uk

Health funding is increasingly based on the results of economic evaluation. But current methods fail to consider all society's health objectives and are too complex for policy makers to use

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

The technical expertise required for conducting economic evaluations and interpreting their results continues to increase. Current best practice includes cost effectiveness acceptability curves, net-benefit frameworks, and probabilistic modelling.1 These methods are valuable, but by generating a pseudoscientific aura around economic evaluation, they camouflage critical weaknesses in current techniques. In this article, I describe the evolution of economic evaluation in health care (see box for terminology), explore the assumptions underlying current approaches and the resulting concerns, and suggest an alternative approach.

Why do we need economic evaluation?

People who are not economists often find it difficult to understand the importance of the theory behind the comparison of costs and effects. After all, if we compare two washing machines of equal cost and one works for 10 years and the other for 15, it is clear that the machine lasting 15 years is a better buy. The need for theory arises, however, because interpersonal rather than within individual . . . [Full text of this article]

Welfare economics

Non-welfare approaches

Camouflaged assumptions associated with recent advances

An alternative route


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain: economic evaluation
Sandra Hollinghurst, Debbie Sharp, Kathleen Ballard, Jane Barnett, Angela Beattie, Maggie Evans, George Lewith, Karen Middleton, Frances Oxford, Fran Webley, and Paul Little
BMJ 2008 337: a2656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on dyspepsia, health resource use, and quality of life in the Bristol helicobacter project: randomised controlled trial
J Athene Lane, Liam J Murray, Sian Noble, Matthias Egger, Ian M Harvey, Jenny L Donovan, Prakash Nair, and Richard F Harvey
BMJ 2006 332: 199-204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care
Joanna Coast, Sian Noble, Alison Noble, Sue Horrocks, Oya Asim, Tim J Peters, and Chris Salisbury
BMJ 2005 331: 1444-1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Prognosis without treatment as a modifier in health economic assessments
Ross Camidge, Andrew Walker, James J Oliver, Fiona Nussey, Simon Maxwell, Duncan Jodrell, and David J Webb
BMJ 2005 330: 1382-1384. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cost utility analysis of co-prescribed heroin compared with methadone maintenance treatment in heroin addicts in two randomised trials
Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Bart P van der Zanden, Corianne A J M de Borgie, Peter Blanken, Jan M van Ree, and Wim van den Brink
BMJ 2005 330: 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Economic evaluation and society's health values: Price and value are different
Peter Davies
BMJ 2005 330: 311. [Extract] [Full Text]

Economic evaluations exclude important health consequences
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Koltowska-Haggstrom, M., Mattsson, A. F, Shalet, S. M (2009). Assessment of quality of life in adult patients with GH deficiency: KIMS contribution to clinical practice and pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Eur J Endocrinol 161: S51-S64 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McCabe, C., Bergmann, L., Bosanquet, N., Ellis, M., Enzmann, H., von Euler, M., Jonsson, B., Kallen, K.-J., Newling, D., Nussler, V., Paschen, B., de Wilde, R., Wilking, N., Teale, C., Zwierzina, H., Biotherapy Development Association, (2009). Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective. Ann Oncol 20: 403-412 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hollinghurst, S., Sharp, D., Ballard, K., Barnett, J., Beattie, A., Evans, M., Lewith, G., Middleton, K., Oxford, F., Webley, F., Little, P. (2008). Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain: economic evaluation. BMJ 337: a2656-a2656 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coast, J., Flynn, T., Sutton, E., Al-Janabi, H., Vosper, J., Lavender, S., Louviere, J., Peters, T. (2008). Investigating Choice Experiments for Preferences of Older People (ICEPOP): evaluative spaces in health economics. J Health Serv Res Policy 13: 31-37 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Harwood, R. H. (2008). Economic evaluations of complex services for older people. Age Ageing 37: 491-493 [Full text]  
  • Schlander, M (2008). The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process. J. Med. Ethics 34: 534-539 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Pleasant, A., Kuruvilla, S. (2008). A tale of two health literacies: public health and clinical approaches to health literacy. HEALTH PROMOT INT 23: 152-159 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cohen, J. P., Stolk, E., Niezen, M. (2008). Role of Budget Impact in Drug Reimbursement Decisions. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 33: 225-247 [Abstract]  
  • Pitman, A. (2007). Policy on the prevention of suicidal behaviour; one treatment for all may be an unrealistic expectation. JRSM 100: 461-464 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barendregt, J. J. (2007). Economics and public health: an arranged marriage. Eur J Public Health 17: 124-124 [Full text]  
  • Wildschut, H. I.J., Peters, T.J., Weiner, C. P. (2006). Screening in women's health, with emphasis on fetal Down's syndrome, breast cancer and osteoporosis. Hum Reprod Update 12: 499-512 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gage, H., Kaye, J., Owen, C., Trend, P., Wade, D. (2006). Evaluating rehabilitation using cost-consequences analysis: an example in Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil 20: 232-238 [Abstract]  
  • Lane, J A., Murray, L. J, Noble, S., Egger, M., Harvey, I. M, Donovan, J. L, Nair, P., Harvey, R. F (2006). Impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on dyspepsia, health resource use, and quality of life in the Bristol helicobacter project: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 332: 199-204 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coast, J., Noble, S., Noble, A., Horrocks, S., Asim, O., Peters, T. J, Salisbury, C. (2005). Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care. BMJ 331: 1444-1449 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Camidge, R., Walker, A., Oliver, J. J, Nussey, F., Maxwell, S., Jodrell, D., Webb, D. J (2005). Prognosis without treatment as a modifier in health economic assessments. BMJ 330: 1382-1384 [Full text]  
  • Dijkgraaf, M. G W, van der Zanden, B. P, de Borgie, C. A J M, Blanken, P., van Ree, J. M, van den Brink, W. (2005). Cost utility analysis of co-prescribed heroin compared with methadone maintenance treatment in heroin addicts in two randomised trials. BMJ 330: 1297- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wade, D. (2005). 'But is the difference clinically significant?'. Clin Rehabil 19: 349-353 [Abstract]  
  • Davies, P. (2005). Economic evaluation and society's health values: Price and value are different. BMJ 330: 311-311 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values?
Peter K Tun
bmj.com, 20 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Defining 'effectiveness' is the key
Rowan H Harwood
bmj.com, 22 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Health Economics, Economic Evaluation and Society’s Health Values: A view from the other side of the pond
Rhiannon T. Edwards
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2004 [Full text]
How valid are the concepts of Health Economics evaluation for Cancer patients with limited survival expectation?
Ahmed N Abbasi
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Economic evaluation and health values in middle income countries: the case of smoking epidemic in Mexico.
Armando Arredondo
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Economic evaluation and society’s health values
Cam Donaldson, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Diminishing Returns on Complex Calculations of QALY
Jacob M. Puliyel, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Difference between prices and value
Peter Davies
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2004 [Full text]
Health economics and cost consequences analysis: a step back in time
John E Brazier, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Re: Diminishing Returns on Complex Calculations of QALY
Pelham M Barton
bmj.com, 8 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Health economics and society’s preferences; of course CEA is not enough
Richard Edlin
bmj.com, 9 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Cost consequences: implicit, opaque and anti scientific
Karl P Claxton, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Re: Health economics and cost consequences analysis: a step back in time
Joanna Coast
bmj.com, 17 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Re: Cost consequences: implicit, opaque and anti scientific
Joanna Coast
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2005 [Full text]
Re: Re: Cost consequences: implicit, opaque and anti scientific
Richard Edlin, et al.
bmj.com, 19 Apr 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ