Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1186 (13 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1186-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBoth the BMJ and the Lancet claim to be globally relevant.1 2 We tested this assertion and assessed the opportunities for readers of these journals in developed countries to learn from research from the developing world.
We abstracted research articles from the BMJ ("papers" and "primary care" sections) and the Lancet ("articles") from 1 March 2003 to 28 February 2004. We assessed each article independently as relevant or not relevant to developing countries, and as providing or not providing an opportunity for health professionals working in the UK health system to learn from experience from developing countries.
We found that 75 of 292 (25%) and 50 of 163 (31%) papers in the BMJ and the Lancet respectively were relevant to developing countries, largely in the fields of tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Only 14 (5%) and 19 (12%), respectively, provided an opportunity for health professionals working in
James N Newell, senior lecturer
Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds LS2 9PL J.N.Newell@leeds.ac.uk
Andrew S Furber, clinical lecturer in public health
School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA