BMJ  2004;329:1177-1179 (13 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1177

Education and debate

The power of positive deviance

David R Marsh, senior child survival advisor1, Dirk G Schroeder, associate professor2, Kirk A Dearden, associate professor3, Jerry Sternin, director4, Monique Sternin, independent consultant5

1 Save the Children Federation (USA), Westport, Connecticut, USA, 2 Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 3 Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA, 4 Positive Deviance Initiative, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA, 5 Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to: D R Marsh, 31 Wildflower Drive, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA dmarsh@savechildren.org

Identifying individuals with better outcome than their peers (positive deviance) and enabling communities to adopt the behaviours that explain the improved outcome are powerful methods of producing change

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

The most efficient way to improve health is to use locally available, sustainable, and effective approaches. In the 1970s policy developers tested the concept that public health interventions could be designed around uncommon, beneficial health behaviours that some community members already practised.1 2 This concept—known as positive deviance3 4—was used successfully to improve the nutritional status of children in several settings in the1990s.5-10 Recently, the approach has also been applied to newborn care, child nutrition, rates of contraception, safe sexual practices, and educational outcomes.11-13 In this article we describe how the approach works, the evidence that it is effective, and possible future applications.

How does positive deviance work?

Positive deviant behaviour (box) is an uncommon practice that confers advantage to the people who practise it compared with the rest of the community. Such behaviours are likely to be affordable, acceptable, and sustainable because they are already practised by at risk people, they do not conflict with . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

Experience and evidence from the field

Advantages and disadvantages

Future challenges?


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Learning from "positive deviance"
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

The power of women, community, and Bob Geldof
Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Poor countries make the best teachers: discuss
Tessa Richards and James Tumwine
BMJ 2004 329: 1113-1114. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Vossenaar, M., Mayorga, E., Soto-Mendez, M. J., Medina-Monchez, S. B., Campos, R., Anderson, A. S., Solomons, N. W. (2009). The Positive Deviance Approach Can Be Used to Create Culturally Appropriate Eating Guides Compatible with Reduced Cancer Risk. J. Nutr. 139: 755-762 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Naimoli, J. F, Challa, S., Schneidman, M., Kostermans, K. (2008). Toward a grounded theory of why some immunization programmes in sub-Saharan Africa are more successful than others: a descriptive and exploratory assessment in six countries. Health Policy Plan 23: 379-389 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Johnston, B. D (2008). Telling stories. Inj. Prev. 14: 281-282 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The ethics of positive deviance approach to reducing smoking uptake among women in Africa and Asia
Assoc. Professor Niyi Awofeso
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ