Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1175-1176 (13 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1175
Martin McKee, professor of European public health1, Barbara McPake, senior lecturer in health economics2
1 European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, 2 Health Systems Development Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Correspondence to: M McKee Martin.McKee@lshtm.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Okuonzi argues that the introduction of market reforms, into the Ugandan health system has been a failure.1 However, health systems are extremely complex and, as the debate about the British internal market shows, attribution of cause and effect is far from easy. The situation in Uganda is equally complex, with reforms taking place against a background of regional conflict, growing inequalities, and changes in other sectors. Furthermore, while Okuonzi focuses on hospitals, it is equally important to look at primary care, which the Ugandan reforms have sought to strengthen.
Can we gain insights about market reforms from other low and middle income countries? It is important to distinguish between reforms directed at funding and those directed at delivery of care. Many policies aimed at funding, such as user fees, increase the economic burden on families. This can deter them from seeking necessary care and increases the risk of impoverishment from
-->
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses