BMJ  2004;329:1166-1168 (13 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1166

Education and debate

Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in the poorest communities

Anthony Costello, director1, David Osrin, senior research fellow1, Dharma Manandhar, executive director2

1 International Perinatal Care Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, 2 Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA), GPO Box 921, Kathmandu, Nepal

Correspondence to: A Costello ipu@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Current programmes are often failing to reach those at highest risk of maternal and neonatal death. The international community needs to learn from community trials in the South

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

Every year 530 000 women die from maternal causes, four million infants die in the neonatal period, and a similar number are stillborn.w1 w2 Despite a plethora of newly validated interventions, the millennium development goals to reduce maternal mortality by three quarters and child mortality by two thirds are unlikely to be achieved.1 One of the reasons for this is that current safer motherhood and newborn care programmes emphasise interventions that do not reach the poorest households. Community based interventions have been neglected and undervalued. In this article, we argue that large scale community effectiveness trials are both necessary and feasible if we are to make further progress with reducing maternal and child mortality.

Peer education is the best method of changing behaviour

Problems with current interventions

The fact that poor people are both more likely to become ill and less likely to get appropriate treatment has not changed since Tudor Hart articulated it in . . . [Full text of this article]

Community based interventions

Need for large scale community public health trials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Learning from low income countries: Investing in traditional birth attendants may help reduce mortality in poor countries
Salem Banajeh
BMJ 2005 330: 478-479. [Extract] [Full Text]

Community initiatives reduce maternal mortality
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

The power of women, community, and Bob Geldof
Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Poor countries make the best teachers: discuss
Tessa Richards and James Tumwine
BMJ 2004 329: 1113-1114. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Health systems and the community
Vinod Paul
BMJ 2004 329: 1117-1118. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hatt, L., Stanton, C., Ronsmans, C., Makowiecka, K., Adisasmita, A. (2009). Did professional attendance at home births improve early neonatal survival in Indonesia?. Health Policy Plan 24: 270-278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Darmstadt, G. L, Walker, N., Lawn, J. E, Bhutta, Z. A, Haws, R. A, Cousens, S. (2008). Saving newborn lives in Asia and Africa: cost and impact of phased scale-up of interventions within the continuum of care. Health Policy Plan 23: 101-117 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Banajeh, S. (2005). Learning from low income countries: Investing in traditional birth attendants may help reduce mortality in poor countries. BMJ 330: 478-479 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Investing on Traditional Birth Attendants to achieve a significant maternal and neonatal mortality reduction in the poorest countriest
Salem M Banajeh
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ