BMJ 2004;329:1166-1168 (13 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1166
Education and debate
Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in the poorest communities
Anthony Costello, director1,
David Osrin, senior research fellow1,
Dharma Manandhar, executive director2
1 International Perinatal Care Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH,
2 Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA), GPO Box 921, Kathmandu, Nepal
Correspondence to: A Costello ipu@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Current programmes are often failing to reach those at highest risk of maternal and neonatal death. The international community needs to learn from community trials in the South
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
Every year 530 000 women die from maternal causes, four million
infants die in the neonatal period, and a similar number are
stillborn.
w1 w2 Despite a plethora of newly validated interventions,
the millennium development goals to reduce maternal mortality
by three quarters and child mortality by two thirds are unlikely
to be achieved.
1 One of the reasons for this is that current
safer motherhood and newborn care programmes emphasise interventions
that do not reach the poorest households. Community based interventions
have been neglected and undervalued. In this article, we argue
that large scale community effectiveness trials are both necessary
and feasible if we are to make further progress with reducing
maternal and child mortality.
Problems with current interventions
The fact that poor people are both more likely to become ill
and less likely to get appropriate treatment has not changed
since Tudor Hart articulated it in
. . . [Full text of this article]
Community based interventions
Need for large scale community public health trials

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Learning from low income countries: Investing in traditional birth attendants may help reduce mortality in poor countries
- Salem Banajeh
BMJ 2005 330: 478-479.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Community initiatives reduce maternal mortality
BMJ 2004 329: 0.
[Full Text]
-
The power of women, community, and Bob Geldof
- Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Poor countries make the best teachers: discuss
- Tessa Richards and James Tumwine
BMJ 2004 329: 1113-1114.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Health systems and the community
- Vinod Paul
BMJ 2004 329: 1117-1118.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hatt, L., Stanton, C., Ronsmans, C., Makowiecka, K., Adisasmita, A.
(2009). Did professional attendance at home births improve early neonatal survival in Indonesia?. Health Policy Plan
24: 270-278
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Darmstadt, G. L, Walker, N., Lawn, J. E, Bhutta, Z. A, Haws, R. A, Cousens, S.
(2008). Saving newborn lives in Asia and Africa: cost and impact of phased scale-up of interventions within the continuum of care. Health Policy Plan
23: 101-117
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Banajeh, S.
(2005). Learning from low income countries: Investing in traditional birth attendants may help reduce mortality in poor countries. BMJ
330: 478-479
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Investing on Traditional Birth Attendants to achieve a significant maternal and neonatal mortality reduction in the poorest countriest
- Salem M Banajeh
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2004
[Full text]