Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1103-1104 (6 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7474.1103-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORHolland and Weiner's clinical review (albeit a traditional non-systematic, opinion based one) on the important topic of Bell's palsy is welcome,1 but we are concerned that their conclusions about treatment are simply not supported by current evidence.
The most recent Cochrane reviews show that no treatment has yet been shown to be more effective than placebo.2 3 The recent studies cited have not yet been included in the systematic reviews but since they are non-randomised, statements that combination therapy is beneficial are not secure.4 Since these treatments are neither inexpensive nor harmless, the issue is important for clinicians, patients, and the health service.
The review by the American Academy of Neurology cited by Holland and Weiner concluded that well designed studies of the effectiveness of treatments for Bell's palsy are still needed. Published trials are mainly hospital based and involve small numbers.5 We are running a trial that avoids
-->
Frank Sullivan, principal investigator
f.m.sullivan@dundee.ac.uk
Fergus Daly, trial coordinator
Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee
Iain Swan, senior lecturer in otolaryngology
University of Glasgow, Glasgow