Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:991-992 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.991
Practising what we teach remains a big challenge
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both....
|
Robert Frost
When Frost pondered these two roads, he did not call for a randomised controlled trial. Life is about chance, and that goes for medicine too. Clinicians know that sometimes the best we can do is make our decision, hope it will have made all the difference, and not pine away about the road not taken. Today, as medicine lurches down the road to an evidence based world view, do we know where we are going? Should we turn back?
Even well intentioned supporters ask what's the "E" for evidence based medicine (EBM)?1 Its most basic assumptions are unproved, indeed largely untested. For example, we do not know whether "convincing information leads to optimal decision making."2 Nor do we know whether most healthcare professionals "base their decisions on the best evidence." As Frost wrote
Brendan M Reilly, chairman
Department of Medicine, Cook County Hospital, 1900 W Polk Street, Suite 1501A, Chicago, IL 60612 USA (breilly@cchil.org)