Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1045 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1045
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
|
|
Credit: DR P MARAZZI/SPL
|
EDITORvan Staaij et al report a large study examining the effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild symptoms of throat infection or adenotonsillar hypertrophy.1 They conclude that adenotonsillectomy confers no major clinical benefits over watchful waiting.
We are concerned that the conclusion may lead to a false sense of security about the safety of watchful waiting. The paper says that children with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea have been excluded because they scored more than 3.5 on Brouillette's obstructive sleep apnoea score.2 A more recent publication from Brouillette et al has indicated that, although a score of greater than 3.5 is suggestive of obstructive sleep apnoea, a score of less than this does not distinguish obstructive sleep apnoea from primary snoring.3
Children with obstructive sleep apnoea are therefore unlikely to have been excluded from the cohort described in the paper by van Staaij et al.
Simon C Langton Hewer, consultant respiratory paediatrician
Flinders Medical Centre, SA 5042, Australia simon.langtonhewer@bris.ac.uk
Claire D Langton Hewer, otorhinolaryngology fellow
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Adelaide, SA 5011
Yvonne Pamula, sleep physiologist, James Martin, consultant respiratory paediatrician, Declan Kennedy, consultant respiratory paediatrician
Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA 5006