Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1044 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1044-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAfter the threat of a court case in New York, GlaxoSmithKline has announced that it will publish results of all its clinical trials on its website.1 2 Eli Lilly recently made a similar announcement, including a commitment to publish all findings in peer reviewed journals.3
This will be welcome news to people such as Abrams and me, who have been (independently) campaigning for this for some time.4 Last year, following several years of consultation, a group from within the pharmaceutical industry published guidelines on good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies.5 One of the main recommendations was for companies to endeavour to publish the results of all clinical trials relating to their marketed products in peer reviewed journals.
We were careful to include the word "endeavour," since, ultimately, journal editors decide what gets published. However, with the growth of electronic journals we believe it is usually possible to publish trials.
Elizabeth Wager, publications consultant
Sideview, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire HP27 9DE liz@sideview.demon.co.uk