BMJ  2004;329:1044 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1044-b

Letter

Pressures are growing to publish clinical trials

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—After the threat of a court case in New York, GlaxoSmithKline has announced that it will publish results of all its clinical trials on its website.1 2 Eli Lilly recently made a similar announcement, including a commitment to publish all findings in peer reviewed journals.3

This will be welcome news to people such as Abrams and me, who have been (independently) campaigning for this for some time.4 Last year, following several years of consultation, a group from within the pharmaceutical industry published guidelines on good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies.5 One of the main recommendations was for companies to endeavour to publish the results of all clinical trials relating to their marketed products in peer reviewed journals.

We were careful to include the word "endeavour," since, ultimately, journal editors decide what gets published. However, with the growth of electronic journals we believe it is usually possible to publish trials. . . . [Full text of this article]

Elizabeth Wager, publications consultant

Sideview, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire HP27 9DE liz@sideview.demon.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

BMJ statistical errors
Tim J Cole, Douglas Altman, Deborah Ashby, Mike Campbell, Jonathan Deeks, Stephen Evans, Hazel Inskip, Julie Morris, and Gordon Murray
BMJ 2004 329: 462. [Extract] [Full Text]

In brief
BMJ 2004 329: 366. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ